subject
Social Studies, 24.05.2021 01:00 tatianna341

Which statement agrees with the idea of checks and balances as stated within the constitution? * The Executive Branch has power to disband (get rid of) the other branches.

The Executive is weak to prevent despotism (tyranny).

The Legislature has no power when compared to the judicial branch.

The Judicial branch can declare laws and executive orders unconstitutional.

PLEASE HURRY :( (NO LINKS)

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:30, dragaozin4505
97 points what types of changes have been made in the united states to protect people from earthquakes? a. communities are no longer located along fault lines. b. building codes ensure that structures can withstand shaking. c. warnings go off when an earthquake is expected, and people evacuate the area. d. barriers have been built to prevent flooding by a tsunami.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30, cici65360
As of 2013, the world’s total population was about
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, caro74
You are bringing together faculty from different behavioral disciplines to author a new textbook in organizational behavior. represented are professors from psychology, sociology, social psychology, anthropology, political science, and industrial engineering. which faculty member is most likely to furnish information about personality, learning, and motivation?
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50, Betzabeth671
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which statement agrees with the idea of checks and balances as stated within the constitution? * Th...

Questions in other subjects: