Problem What is probably the most important difference between dating based on ancient writings and dating based on radioactive decay of organic materials?

Even though radioactive dating's accuracy is plus or minus a few decades, the accuracy of ancient writings is far worse. Consider the Bible which is full of stories about how mankind originated and developed. If you believe every single word in the Genesis, then the world is less than 10,000 years old.

But since not everyone is Christian or Jewish or Muslim (the old testament is basically the same for all three), lets take ancient Chinese writings where dragons and spirits ruled the world and they lived for hundreds of thousands of years, and humans lived enough to record their ages.

What other ancient texts can we use? Most of them are exaggerations of some real life event that happened and was told from one generation to the next until someone learned how to write and created their own version. The problem with stories that pass from one generation to the next is that they are never repeated or passed 100% exactly like the way they happened.

Also remember that humans back in ancient times lived around 30 years only, so a 200 year old story would have been told many times from a 30 or so grandparent to their children and then to the grandchildren.

the answer you are looking for is letter c. he supported the idea of a un-run war in serbia to bring peace to the area.

supporting this idea was an important step that bill clinton took in order to attempt to secure bosnia and keep the peace there. he led peace reconciliations -known as the dayton agreement- leaving bosnia as a single state made up of two parts with one central government.

nations must cooperate to bring about and maintain world peace.

nations must not wage wars or commit war crimes in a desire to control other nations.

i think i know which options you have but if these aren't options let me know