Under which of the following circumstances would a Utilitarian DEFINITELY NOT endorse providing a patient with active euthanasia? At least one answer is correct, and no more than four are correct.
When the patient is unable to make it known whether they would prefer active or passive euthanasia.
When the patient's condition is untreatable and terminal, and the only difference active euthanasia makes is causing
them to die sooner and in less pain.
When the patient's suffering can be relieved without causing their death or causing anyone else to suffer.
When the patient's condition is untreatable, but not terminal, and they could possibly go on living for many years
Whenever a fully informed, rational patient has requested it, regardless of their medical status or reason for making
the request.

i think you really need to revive you answer! : d

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.

acts of terrorism occur globally. the united nations global counter-terrorism strategy was created in order to build adequate systems of support and solidarity with victims of terrorism. here´s a summary of the proposed key themes: the importance of giving victims a face and a voice; protecting their dignity; giving victims legal status and defending their legal rights; providing victims with medical, psycho-social and financial support; building solidarity with victims; improving media coverage of victims; and focusing on the link between victims and counter-terrorism efforts more generally.

answer; the miracles;