Which of the following cases would the Court most likely grant a writ of certiorari? A.
A case from the 13th circuit court in which the lower appellate court misapplied a maritime law.
B.
A case from an international tribunal in which the defendant, who was accused of terrorism in Malaysia, is of both American and Canadian citizenship.
C.
A case sent directly up from a district court in which the defendant, who was accused of murder, charges that the district court judge did not properly instruct the jury.
D.
A case involving an Indiana politician who violated Indiana law while in office.

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?