Social Studies, 12.03.2020 16:42 boportsmouth7908

Suppose that at trial, Hanousek argued that he should not be convicted because he was not aware of the requirements of the CWA. Would this defense be successful? Why or why not?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

CWA is referred to as the Communications Workers of America which is the largest and the broad communication network between the different unions of the workers of America. This is an established union and has around 27 local in Canada and the rest of the members are spread all over the country.

This defense would not be successful because he was responsible and accountable for maintaining safety and looking after the construction of railway tracks and surrounding marine facilities. Due to a new project, digging started on the surface by its sister company the underlying pipeline get affected and discharged large quantity of oil into marine water.

To know more about the awareness of the requirements of the CWA, refer to the link below:

link

Answer from: ChessieGiacalone

Suppose that at trial, Hanousek argued that he should not be convicted because he was not aware of the requirements of the CWA- This defense would not be successful. Because he was responsible for maintaining safety and look after the whole construction of railway track and surrounding marine facilities.

Explanation:

Hanousek was worked for Pacific and Arctic railway and navigation company. He was the main responsible person to take care of the running construction of railway track and its surrounding marine life. So when due to new project, digging started on the surface by its sister company the underlying pipe line get affected and discharged large quantity of oil into marine water.

As a road master Hanousek should be aware about every work which is undertaken or will start near his ongoing project. That he was not. So its one kind of violation of clean water act.

Answer from: Quest

You can do

Answer from: Quest

Ithink it would be choice b (county). hope this you!

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:10, kevinh2683

In griswold v. connecticut, on what did justice goldberg base his concurring opinion? the protection granted by the constitution the intention of the writers of the constitution the list of rights in the first eight amendments the human rights safe from government intervention

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30, ghari112345

Morei would really appreciate it. his eyes snapped open. a musty smell flooded his senses. the room was lowly lit, curved with smooth light gray walls. the floor was clear black tiled. he stood up, surprised to see no door, but only a trap door on the ceiling that blended in with the walls. the room was unfurnished, which struck him as strange. as you write and revise, ask yourself these questions: 1. do all of the sentences in this paragraph belong here? (unity) 2. are all of the sentences in this paragraph in the right place? (coherence-- a method of development) 3. are all of the sentences in this paragraph smoothly connected together into a whole paragraph? (coherence--use of transitional devices) once you've made certain that your paragraphs are both unified and coherent, edit your work for problems in grammar and mechanics before submitting it to your teacher.

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00, monicagalarza

Which supreme court dressed the second a. presser v. illinois b. quilici v. the village of morton grove c. united states v. cruikshank d. united states v. miller

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:00, isaacchan

What do turbans indicate about the wearer? a. the wearer’s social status the wearer’s social statusb. the wearer’s birthplacethe wearer’s birthplacec. the wearer’s marital statusthe wearer’s marital statusd. the wearer’s religious sect the wearer’s religious sect

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

Suppose that at trial, Hanousek argued that he should not be convicted because he was not aware of t...