Wich shapes have 2 obtuse angles

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Line segment eg is partitioned by point f in the ratio 1: 1. point e is at e (0, 4), and point f is at (1, 3). what are the coordinates of point g? (−1, 5) (2, 2) (3, 1) (4, 0)

Which of the following parabolas opens up?