subject
Mathematics, 03.12.2020 17:20 timothymoles

A botanist found a correlation between the length of an aspen leaf and its surface area to be 0.94. Why does the correlation value of 0.94 not necessarily indicate that a linear model is the most appropriate model for the relationship between length of an aspen leaf and its surface area? A) The value must be exactly 1 or -1 to indicate a linear model is the most appropriate model.

B) The value must be 0 to indicate a linear model is the most appropriate model.

C) A causal relationship should be established first before determining the most appropriate model.

D) The value of 0.94 implies that only 88% of the data have a linear relationship.

E) Even with a correlation value of 0.94, it is possible that the relationship could still be better represented by a nonlinear model.

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Mathematics

image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:50, Felicitybuckman
What is the square root of 45? (step by step working plz)
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:20, maritzamartinnez
Two lines parallel to the same plane are parallel to eachother
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00, Pookaapoo8832
For what value of (y) is 3^3/3^y =1/9
Answers: 1
image
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30, thisusernameistaken2
Complete the solution of the equation. find the value of y when x equals to 1 9x-5y=29
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A botanist found a correlation between the length of an aspen leaf and its surface area to be 0.94....

Questions in other subjects: