50 pointswhy is partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1: 3 not the same as finding the length of the directed line segment? the ratio given is part to whole, but fractions compare part to part. the ratio given is part to part. the total number of parts in the whole is 3 – 1 = 2.the ratio given is part to part. the total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.the ratio given is part to whole, but the associated fraction is .

The ratio given is part to part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that partitioning a directed line segment into a ratio of 1:3 means that we are dividing the given line segment into two parts whose first part is 1 times the of some quantity while the another part is 3 times of the same quantity. So basically we are comparing part to part in by ratio. And total number of parts in the whole will be just sum of both so we get 1+3=4

Hence choice (3) is correct answer.

"The ratio given is part to part. The total number of parts in the whole is 1 + 3 = 4."

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

and?

step-by-step explanation: