History, 06.11.2019 17:31 jungkookie001

Many argue it would be beneficial to have few elections because
a. so many candidates in one party can be confusing
b. there are too many candidates and referendums to vote on
c. fewer elections would bring a higher voter turnout
d. fewer elections would mean regulating the terms of elected officials to four years

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: History

History, 21.06.2019 19:40, emmanuelcampbel

Considering the benefits and drawbacks of the different types of money as well as the gold standard, do you agree or disagree with the us government’s decision to discontinue the gold standard? justify your response.

Answers: 2

continue

History, 21.06.2019 22:00, hardwick744

Which did president carter refuse to do in his attempt to free american hostages taken by iran?

Answers: 1

continue

History, 22.06.2019 01:50, ikgopoleng8815

The system of checks and balances was designed for what purpose? fear of strong state power to keep power out of one branch to appease the southern states to allow the judicial branch to have equal power

Answers: 2

continue

History, 22.06.2019 02:30, valejuan

The code talkers work contributed mostly to

Answers: 3

continue

You know the right answer?

Many argue it would be beneficial to have few elections because
a. so many candidates in one...