How did the supreme court's interpretation of the equal protection clause differ in the plessy v. ferguson and brown v. board of education rulings?

a. in plessy, the supreme court ruled that the clause allowed racial segregation; in brown, it ruled that the clause did not allow segregation.
b. in plessy, the supreme court ruled that the clause allowed affirmative action programs; in brown, it ruled that the clause did not allow such programs.
c. in plessy, the supreme court ruled that the clause gave african americans a right to equal protection; in brown, it reversed that decision.
d. in plessy, the supreme court ruled that the clause extended equal protection to the states; in brown, it reversed that decision.

Option A.

Explanation:

In Plessy, the Supreme Court ruled that the clause allowed racial segregation; in Brown, it ruled that the clause did not allow segregation, is the right answer.

In the history of the Supreme Court of the United States, the ruling in the Plessy V. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of Education is of most significant. Through the ruling in the Plessy V. Ferguson case, the Supreme  Court of the United States authorised the segregation sponsored by the state, as far as it was related to public education. However, the ruling of the Supreme Court in the Brown v. Board of Education the ruling of the Plessy V. Ferguson case was announced illegal (in public education)

a. In Plessy, the Supreme Court ruled that the clause allowed racial segregation; in Brown, it ruled that the clause did not allow segregation

Explanation:

a p e x :)

hr2520 is the patient's act. there is required the secretary of health to summon a committee to develop a national strategic plan of prevention. this committee has forth provisions that make possible for the govern entities to acquire private health insurance services.

is easier to keep this hr2520 as federal, because that way the secretary of health has centralized power to deal with private insurance companies and the federas government has more ways and power to negotiate with them, than doing this process state by state in their specific terms.

the image shown is not a reliable source. it is not a photograph taken of the event, and it is not a painting created by someone who witnessed the event. the image can be considered yellow journalism because it is sensational and exaggerated. the explosion did not likely cause bodies to fly in the air or create a large fireball, as shown here. the image was created to make the american public angry about the explosion, not to show what actually happened.

the painting is not reliable.

the painting is exaggerated.

the painting is inaccurate.

the painting was created to make the public angry, not to show what really happened.