Which of the following does not describe The Articles of Confederation? A The Articles created a weak federal government.
B The Articles created states that were dependent on each other.
C The Articles permitted states to conduct their own affairs,
D The Articles took four years to be adopted.

The statement that the Articles of Confederation does create states that were dependent on each other is not correct.

The Articles of confederation is a form of constitution which outlines the function and responsibility of the State government, Central government and the Congress.

The Articles of confederation was drafted to forms the weak Central government and strong state government.

The Articles of Confederation does created a weak federal government, permitted states to conduct their own affairs and took four years to be adopted.

Therefore, the Option B is correct because its does not describes the Articles of Confederation.

Learn more about this here

link

Hey there! I'm happy to help!

When The Articles of Confederation were created, people were terrified of the central government, so people wanted to make the government very small and give the states more power. Therefore, answers A and C does describe the articles of confederation.

During 1777, the British had taken over the US capital of Philadelphia, so the temporary capital was York, Pennsylvania, the Continental Congress decided to set up their government with the Articles of Confederation as the central document. Maryland finally ratified in 1781, making it the law. Therefore, they took four years to be adopted. Answer D does describe the articles.

Therefore, the correct option is B. The articles created states that were dependent on each other. If the states were given lots of power from the articles they won't be depending on other states.

Have a wonderful day! :D

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

answer: alexander the great

explanation: