BRANLIST!
Describe a criticism of the judicial branch, and state why you agree or disagree with this criticism.

A criticism of the judicial branch is that it has less of a check and balance than the other two branches in the sense that when it declares something as unconstitutional, the other two branches cannot veto or undo this decision. Basically, it has the power to make any law or decision unconstitutional without a check on that power. I disagree with this because the judicial branch has not declared anything unreasonably unconstitutional and they mostly use this power in ways that help the country as a whole

Explanation:

answer: ensure protection from communism

explanation:

the north atlantic treaty was largely dormant until the korean war initiated the establishment of nato to implement it, by means of an integrated military structure: this included the formation of supreme headquarters allied powers europe in 1951, which adopted the western union's military structures and plans.