Please help!n There was a reevaluation message sent about the incident; what did it say may have accounted for the earlier warnings of torpedo attacks?

Some messages were sent, that acted as early warnings of Torpedo attacks.

The wellspring of the data was a U.S. field-site cautioning dispatched precisely one hour sooner, at 7:40 Saigon time, by streak priority to Maddox, its kindred destroyer Turner Joy, and different addressees. In part declassified in March 2003, the message peruses: Haiphong educated Vessel T142 (Swatow Class) to prepare for military activities the evening of 04 August. The sister transport, T-146 has likewise gotten comparable requests. Message trades show that all endeavors are being made to incorporate MTB (Motor Torpedo Boat) T333 right now, soon as extra oil can be acquired for that vessel.  

Only three minutes after the fact a similar unit transmitted another admonition to Maddox: At 0910Z [Zulu, or Greenwich Mean, time], Haiphong educated Vessel T142 of DeSoto destroyers area: Time 1345 (Golf [Hanoi time]) 106-19-30E/19-36-23N. Haiphong's following was exact.  

On board Maddox, Captain John J. Herrick, leader of the two-destroyer task bunch CTG 72.1, and the destroyer's captain, Commander Herbert L. Ogier, had reason to worry. Swatows were Chinese-fabricated engine gunboats equipped for making twenty-eight bunches. The eighty-three-foot-long vessels conveyed a team of thirty men furnished with 37mm and 14.5mm firearms, just as surface hunt radar and profundity charges. P-4s were Soviet-constructed engine torpedo pontoons that could surpass fifty bunches. In spite of the fact that littler and with an eleven-man group, the P-4 conveyed two torpedoes with a scope of forty-500 yards. The admonition was even more foreboding since one of the North Vietnamese naval force vessels recognized in the message — T-333, doled out to Division 3 of PT Squadron 135 — had assaulted Maddox thirty miles off the North Vietnamese coast two days sooner.

Explanation:

the answer is a new goverment.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.