Check my answer?

read the following poem and identify at least two elements of structure, three elements of sound and three elements of figurative language. for each element, provide an example from the poem and analyze it.

"wealth" by langston hughes

from christ to ghandi
appears this truth—
st. francis of assisi
proves it, too:
goodness becomes grandeur
surpassing might of kings.
halos of kindness
brighter shine
than crowns of gold,
and brighter
than rich diamonds
sparkles
the simple dew
of love.

my
structure:

- form - descriptive poem

- sonnet - has 14 lines

sound:

- enjambment is used since it has us read the poem in a type of way and creates a flow to the poem.

- alliteration is another one ("goodness becomes grandeur", " kindness") this causes us to compare the two contrasting thoughts.

- assonance - repetition of vowel sounds. repetition of the word "brighter" - increases the idea of love/kindness.

figurative language:

- metaphors: "halos of kindness" "the simple dew / of love", both emphasise the worth and simplicity of kindness/love, making them seem both godly and natural.

- allusions to biblical/religious figures who have connotations with kindness (especially to the weak or vulnerable)

- imagery associated with wealth (gold, diamonds) highlights the contrast between worldly materialism and more ethereal virtues.

Elements of structure are: Free verse is used to express the simplicity of the message; line length—the lines get shorter and shorter as the speaker makes his point.Elements of sound are: alliteration—"Goodness becomes grandeur"; repetition of words "brighter than"; assonance—"Christ," "might," "kindness," "brighter," "shine," "diamonds."Elements of figurative language are: allusion—Christ, Ghandi, St. Francis are all historical figures of peace and social change; understatement—dew shines brighter than diamonds, showing that simple goodness is more beautiful than riches; symbols—crowns of gold and diamonds represent earthly riches;and imagery—the sight of sparkling diamonds and shining gold.

is that the whole question?

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest