Read these sentences from paragraph 13. Snobby commentators like Erik Sevareid found the whole exercise dubious, an expression of America’s obnoxious desire to accomplish great things for the sake of doing so, regardless of cost or danger. “It is possible that the divine spark in man will consume him in flames . . . ,” he said in his dour CBS commentary. . . . In these lines the writer uses the rhetorical fallacy known as — A) personal attack Eliminate B) appeal to fear C) stereotyping D) appeal to pity

Read the passage first of all if someone says your dream is impossible, they’re wrong. you can’t prove that something is impossible-all you know is that[it] hasn’t been done yet. people said no one could scale mount everest but in 1953, sir edmund hilary and tenzing norway gazed down upon the world from it’s summit. people said that man could not fly, but in 1903, orville and wilbur wright made the first sustained powered flight in a heavier-than-air machine. people said, “okay, we admit that someone could climb mount everest, and we admit that man has learned to fly, but no one will ever, ever walk on the face of the moon.” if we can send three men a quarter of a million miles away and bring them home safely, is there any great task we cannot accomplish? which identifies the textual evidence that best supports the claim: the authors purpose is to persuade? a: the author shares historical information about the wright brothers. b: the author states that men have walked the moon. c: the author states that others who think your dreams are impossible are wrong. d: the author wants to know what tasks we cannot accomplish.

May someone me answer these questions

Describe how the festival of spring bring out the latent joy in human nature?