Can anyone out with this detail one way that you could act that would not be acting legally or ethically.
i can violate the child protection law and respond to violence to not main legality. i will not consider the mental or physical illness of the children and would put them in a situation which can aggravate their condition to not main ethicality. also, if i am not involved with any institution, it may include an act which can leave a mark on their psychological health. for example, as can be fiund out from the market research, nestle had been involved in a number of misledadimg and mislguiding marketing adavertisements or acts and has been hugely criticized for the same. from manipulating with the milk solution to the manipulation of the minds of gthe children. nestle, had been involved in all sorts of behaviour, which are both illegal and unethical. i don't wont this one i try to think some else