Suppose that an attack would do $300,000 in damage and has a 20% annual probability of success. spending $15,000 per year on countermeasure a would reduce the damage of a successful attack by 50%. a) do a risk analysis comparing benefits and costs. show your work clearly. explain whether or not the company should spend the money. b) do another risk analysis if countermeasure b costs $30,000 per year but would cut the annual probability of a successful attack by 40%. again, show your work. explain whether or not the company should spend the money.
Answers: 2
Other questions on the subject: Business
Business, 22.06.2019 11:20, ebt2367
Money aggregates identify whether each of the following examples belongs in m1 or m2. if an example belongs in both, be sure to check both boxes. example m1 m2 gilberto has a roll of quarters that he just withdrew from the bank to do laundry. lorenzo has $25,000 in a money market account. neha has $8,000 in a two-year certificate of deposit (cd).
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 11:40, sriggins1375
Manipulation manufacturing's (amm) standards anticipate that there will be 5 pounds of raw material used for every unit of finished goods produced. amm began the month of maymay with 8,000 pounds of raw material, purchased 25,500 pounds for $ 15,300 and ended the month with 7,400 pounds on hand. the company produced 4,9004,900 units of finished goods. the company estimates standard costs at $ 1.10 per pound. the materials price and efficiency variances for the month of maymay were:
Answers: 1
Business, 22.06.2019 14:40, ZoomZoom44
You are purchasing a bond that currently sold for $985.63. it has the time-to-maturity of 10 years and a coupon rate of 6%, paid semi-annually. the bond can be called for $1,020 in 3 years. what is the yield to maturity of this bond?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Suppose that an attack would do $300,000 in damage and has a 20% annual probability of success. spen...
Questions in other subjects:
Physics, 27.07.2019 17:40
