Paxton wrote this conclusion to an opinion piece. In conclusion, Hiking and Biking was a great book because it has lots of information.
How could Paxton improve his conclusion?
A. Restate his topic.
B. Give reasons for his opinion.
C. Add one more sentence to convince his readers.
D. Use linking words or phrases to connect his ideas.

Can someone me translate this latin? marcus delphos, qui est in graecia, iter est facturus. est iter difficile, sed in delphis sunt multa nova videre. verba apollinis audire cupit. delphi est locus qui apollini sacer est. pupulia fidei ex omnibus partibus terrae delphos, domus dei. veniunt et auxilium petunt. sacerdos marco responsa verbis donabit. etiam, in delphis, templa, thesauros, et fontem sacrum apollini muisique visurus est. tum, omnibus visis, marcus discedet et si responsum erit verum videre exspectabit.

Read the sentence. at the end of the day, the dusk was filled by the coyote's haunting call. which revision puts the sentence in the active voice while maintaining the meaning? at the end of the day, the coyote’s haunting call filled the dusk. at the end of the day, the coyote’s call haunted and filled the dusk. at the end of the day, the coyote’s call was haunting the dusk. at the end of the day, the coyote was calling the haunted dusk.

Pls i give ! i will give you 50 points no ! its a essay by the way so pls do it well at the beginning of the story, alicia is convinced that scallops will hurt her. why then does she claim at the end of the story that she was going to have "a good day"?