Read the two passages from sugar changed the world. by the late 1700s, saint domingue (what is now haiti) was the world center of sugar. so many sugar plantations dotted the landscape that slaves called commanders managed other slaves. on the night of august 14, 1791, commanders from the richest sugar plantations in saint domingue gathered in a place called alligator woods and swore a solemn oath. they would rise up against their white owners, "and listen to the voice of liberty which speaks in the hearts of all of us." that voice told them to destroy everything related to sugar. sugar made the africans slaves, so sugar must be wiped off the island, now a vast sugar factory to the world. by the end of august, the french colony was in flames. so many cane fields were on fire that the air was filled with "a rain of fire composed of burning bits of cane-straw which whirled like thick snow." smashing mills, destroying warehouses, setting fields on fire, the freedom fighters demolished some one thousand plantations—and that was just in the first two months of their revolution. the fight against sugar and chains soon had a leader, toussaint, who called himself "l’ouverture”—the opening. toussaint was making a space, an opening, for people to be free. when the haitians defeated the french armies, napoleon lost control of the world's most productive sugar islands and with it his dream of great sugar profits. as a result, napoleon had no use for the land in north america he had so recently obtained from spain. napoleon did, though, need money to pay for his wars. that is why he sold the vast louisiana territory to jefferson for the bargain price of just fifteen million dollars. what textbooks call the louisiana purchase should really be named the sugar purchase. americans obtained the middle part of what would become their nation because the haitians achieved their freedom. which claim do both passages support? haiti is a small island nation that has had little effect on events in north america or europe. sugar was such a powerful economic force that it led to significant political changes. events in one part of the world rarely have a significant effect on people in other regions. natural disasters such as fires can have both political and economic impacts on colonies.