The answer to the question could be:
Es lícito juzgar a otra persona cuando dicha acción está encaminada a mejorar el comportamiento de dicha persona y mejorar su calidad de vida, regularmente las personas juzgan simplemente para sentirse superiores a una persona, sin importarle realmente su bienestar ni brindar una posible opción o cambio de actitud que debería tomar, por ésta razón, cada vez que pienses en juzgar a una persona debes pensar:
¿Mi interés es ayudar a dicha persona o solo criticarla?¿Realmente será benéfico para alguien que yo emita dicho juicio (incluida la persona involucrada)?
En caso de que la respuesta a las preguntas anteriores sea la primera opción brindad, se podría considerar lícito criticarla.
Explanation:
The translation of the paragraph is:
It is lawful to judge another person when such action is aimed at improving the behavior of said person and improving their quality of life, people regularly judge simply to feel superior to a person, regardless of their well-being or provide a possible option or change of attitude that you should take, for this reason, every time you think about judging a person you should think:
Is my interest in helping that person or just criticizing him?
Will it really be beneficial for someone who issues that judgment (including the person involved)?
In case the answer to the previous questions is the first option, it could be considered lawful to criticize it.
The judgments that we emit many of the times are usually hurtful and their only objective is to belittle a person who is possibly making a mistake, so you must be very cautious when issuing a judgment on someone to avoid hurting him/her, always thinking that the words you use are aimed at helping that person and your interest is solely and exclusively to help her avoid such behavior and support him/her.
