subject
Social Studies, 21.07.2019 11:30 dwilburn01

The social communication model for customer communication differs from the conventional promotion model in that the social communication model

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30, lilybrok04
A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.
Answers: 3
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:40, shaloveywrighty5965
Mrs. walter’s husband died in 2016. she has not remarried and has maintained a home for herself and her dependent son, whom she can claim as a dependent. in the summer of 2018, the son was killed in an automobile accident. what is mrs. walter’s filing status for 2018
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30, nitoad
What was the result of president taft's "dollar diplomacy
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00, toxsicity
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The social communication model for customer communication differs from the conventional promotion mo...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 27.10.2019 22:43
Konu
Mathematics, 27.10.2019 22:43