Meerkats are small desert mammals that live in groups of 20–50 individuals. you observe one meerkat standing upright on a stump, looking around, while other meerkats forage for food. you hypothesize that this is an example of kin selection. what additional information would you need to know to evaluate your hypothesis? all other activities of this meerkat as well as those of all other members of the group the body size of this meerkat relative to other members of the group the degree of genetic relatedness of this meerkat to all members of the group the gender of this meerkat as well as that of all other members of the group the foraging success of this meerkat as well as that of all other members of the group

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.