subject
Social Studies, 28.07.2019 12:30 ngilliam1444

What effect did the invention of the cotton gin have on cotton production in the years between 1790 and 1820? a.)cotton production grew very quickly, so that it was ten times higher in 1820. b.)cotton production slowly declined because of the high cost of cotton gins. c.)cotton production shrank very quickly because of the high costs of labor. d.)cotton production remained almost the same from 1790 to 1820.

Answers

ansver
Answer from: jojojolie8570
The answer is A because it made getting rid of the seeds easier. Also increased the number of slaves in America
ansver
Answer from: Skylynn11
With the cotton grin, cotton became much more worthwhile crop because ratio output quantity decrease a lot more. also the plantation owner can make a more money or a larger profit on the use of slavery workers.

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:00, sophiaa23
Which statement below accurately describes the carrying capacity of any ecosystem? a. it is not affected by any abiotic or biotic resources. b. it does not affect the species of an ecosystem. c. it is completely dependent upon the food supply. d. it is affected by both abiotic and biotic resources
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:10, yennie123
In a study, people were asked to imagine simple occasions that made them happy and to remember events that made them feel proud about themselves. it was observed that the subjects developed an increasingly positive attitude. these changes are known to be healthy, leading to greater physical activity and reducing unhealthy habits. based on this excerpt, we can conclude that a positive attitude .
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 12:30, madcat226
Which process the body warm up when its cold
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00, leezas1101
Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is “barren”? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotle’s reasoning? briefly explain.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
What effect did the invention of the cotton gin have on cotton production in the years between 1790...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 06.05.2020 21:24
Questions on the website: 14459959