Ahistorian is making a historical argument about the french revolution. he notes that, following the revolution, a rash of violence swept over france. he refers to the execution of french royalty and the european wars that revolutionaries launched following their victory to support his argument. in his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. based on this information, he argues that the french revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones. which part of the historian's argument does not rely on any historical evidence?

What are the functions of wal-mart? are they the same or different from the functions of wal-mart in our individual lives? how do the two type of functions connect? does wal-mart have both manifest and latent functions? what are they? are there any dysfunctions of wal-mart for society? if so, what are they? how might these dysfunctions serve as incentives or catalysts for social change? conflict questions: does wal-mart affect every group in society in the same way? if not, what are the differences? how does wal-mart perpetuate the inequalities (of gender, race, class, religion, age, sexual orientation, etc.) in our society? how does wal-mart contribute to conflict between unequal groups in our society? how might wal-mart contribute to social change or the amelioration of inequalities in society? interactionist questions: what kind of symbolic world are you likely to encounter inside a wal-mart store, and how does that affect the shopper’s experience? how does wal-mart influence our interpersonal interactions? how do interpersonal interactions shape the wal-mart experience for shoppers? for workers? how does wal-mart contribute to our socially constructed reality?