Which countries on both sides of the atlantic experienced revolutions during the late 18th and early 19th centuries?

At which level of production does the company make the most profit? the first pair of cleats the second pair of cleats the third pair of cleats the fourth pair of cleats

For questions 6-10, match the letter of the description that best matches the term. descriptions: a. to people reach their full potential b. refers to a persons drive to reach his or her full potential c. name the type of therapy developed by rogers d. being accepted by another just as you are, or accepting someone else just as they are e. the bottom of maslows hierarchy 6. need for food, water and oxygen 7. client centered therapy 8. self-actualization 9. the goal of the humanistic approach 10. unconditional positive regard

Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.