Floyd claims the constitution both recognizes rights that are and rights that are not absolute. how does his reference to "the freedom of one's body" illustrate what he sees as rights that are not absolute: question 7 options:

There is no constitutional right to sell an Organ.
Even though constitution admit that you had the full right for full freedom to do whatever you want to your body, selling an organ is strictly illegal because it may create a market that could endanger many of human's life if it's left handled by the private sectors who constantly seek ways to cut expenses.

The  government  of ancient  egypt  was a theocratic monarchy as the king ruled by a mandate from the gods, initially was seen as an intermediary between human beings and the divine, and was supposed to represent the gods' will through the laws passed and policies approved

Okay perfect i'll be sure to do that lol