Alawyer trying to understand why a particular supreme court justice often agreed with the court's rulings, but not the reasoning behind them, should study that justice's a. concurring opinions b. appellate opinions c. majority opinions d. dissenting opinions

If a judge agrees with outcome of case, but not with reasoning of the majority, the judge may submit a concurring opinion.

Explanation:

If a judge agrees with outcome of case, but not with reasoning of the majority, the judge may submit a concurring opinion.

Unless, on the grounds of evaluating the case, no actual majority of the court may consent, the court's ruling may be found in a variety of concurrent opinions, and the concurrent opinion reached by the largest number of judges is considered the plurality opinion.

what's this it's not giving you what have to do.

answer; first blank(1); 30% two(2); salmonella; i believe this is correct; //good luck;