subject
Social Studies, 20.07.2019 06:20 megan5192

Romy understands that if she has 4 pieces of pizza and we give her 2 more, she will have 6. however, she does not know what happens if she has 6 and we take away 2. piaget would say that romy: a. has demonstrated a scaffold. b. has exhibited centration. c. has demonstrated irreversible thinking. d. is thinking in a static way.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:30, keyonaemanieevans
Ato z on the bun timeline show where the events listed a through g board blow fit on the timeline
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:00, Tcrismon1000
What was the purpose of the federalist papers? a. to revise the articles of confederationb. to oppose ratification of the constitution c. to encourage support for the ratification of the constitutiond. to invite people to the constitutional convention
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00, rebtav
The industrial revolution began in great britain for a number of reasons. two advantages great britain had which were necessary for industrialization were a. raw materials and a large workforce. b. unstable politics and a small landmass. c. abundant land and a small population. d. private wealth and a strong military.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00, tcjet
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred. at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act. b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act. c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan. d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Romy understands that if she has 4 pieces of pizza and we give her 2 more, she will have 6. however,...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Social Studies, 22.01.2020 17:31
Konu
Mathematics, 22.01.2020 17:31