How does the idea of an "ozone hole" exemplify social construction?

The social construction of the "ozone hole" signifies a kingdom deprived of meddling from people and how local individuals have occasionally been erroneously blamed for wildlife fatalities, leading to their compulsory elimination from wilderness areas; the battles over the construction of certain sceneries as worthy of travel; and, the use of environmental defense opinions to reject poorer people from wealthy neighborhoods and to limit colonization.

can you explain it better