Social Studies, 23.09.2019 05:30 sdepasquale24
Why did smaller states object to the virginia plan
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:30, Animallover100
Put the steps below into their correct order to show how to survey an essay
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30, deadman76751
Charles schenck was a u. s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u. s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50, adjjones2011
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
Why did smaller states object to the virginia plan...
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 08:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 08:10
Spanish, 01.04.2021 08:10
English, 01.04.2021 08:10
English, 01.04.2021 08:10
Mathematics, 01.04.2021 08:10