Explain the difference between what kant calls a categorical imperative and a counsel of prudence

It might be stated that Kant's three imperative formulations are the Universal Law, Humanity and Autonomy. The first one might “act in accordance with a maxim if you can at the same time will it as a universal law”, the second might “act so that you can use humanity, rather in yourself or another, as an end (in itself), and never merely as a means”, and the last one might act in accordance with maxims that would be enacted into law be a legislator and member of a realm of ends. On the other hand, he defines Counsel of Prudence as the “hypothetical Imperatives that have happiness as their end; ex: make friends so as to be happy”.

It's considered to be association or connection

Fiscal policy because it refers to the use of government spending and tax policies to influence macroeconomic conditions, including aggregate demand, employment, inflation, and economic growth.