Which of the following effects would not likely result from enacting a free trade agreement?
a. imports would increase.
b. exports would increase.
c. prices of goods would decrease.
d. quotas and tariffs would increase.

The correct answer is the fourth (D).

Free trade is a model of foreign trade where countries negotiate and exchange their productions without adopting protectionist quotas and tariffs on both sides.

In this context, each country will produce what is most efficient and import what is least efficient in producing. Consequently, with the adoption of a free trade agreement, exports and imports tend to increase and the price of goods should decrease, since the introduction of imported goods is a way of stimulating competition.

The only alternative that does not make sense for free trade is the increase in tariffs and quotas, just the opposite. So that's the answer.

the most likely outcome of fewer loon territories is that hawks would increase in proportion because the benefit of victory would be greater. hawks and loons are natural rivals of resources and victories in the game, since the lakes drying up affected the loons, the hawks would be benefited from the drought.

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.