The American Civil War 1861-1865 was the defining event of the 19th century for the U. S

The Civil War or American Civil War (in English, American Civil War, or simply Civil War in the United States) was a warlike conflict fought in the United States from 1861 to 1865. As a result of a historical controversy over slavery, the War broke out in April 1861, when forces from the Confederate States of America attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, shortly after President Abraham Lincoln took office. Union nationalists proclaimed allegiance to the United States Constitution. They faced secessionists from the Confederate States, who defended the rights of the states to expand slavery.

Explanation:

The Civil War or American Civil War (in English, American Civil War, or simply Civil War in the United States) was a warlike conflict fought in the United States from 1861 to 1865. As a result of a historical controversy over slavery, the War broke out in April 1861, when forces from the Confederate States of America attacked Fort Sumter in South Carolina, shortly after President Abraham Lincoln took office. Union nationalists proclaimed allegiance to the United States Constitution. They faced secessionists from the Confederate States, who defended the rights of the states to expand slavery

Explanation:

Mexican

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

  a) written constitution. also known as magna carta and a necessity of the democracies that form federations to regulate the principles by which the government will be governed, because if they had to act without a body of specific laws would produce confrontations.

b) territorial division. federalism is constituted by the division of powers on the geographical basis of each territory.

c) decentralization. in a federal system there is both a central government and units of government lower than the central one, each making decisions regarding the provision of certain public services in their respective geographical jurisdictions.

d) supreme court of justice. to counteract the rigidity of the written constitution, judicial action is required to interpret said constitution and necessary changes can be made.