Justify the the statement Nepal is small but resembles the world

please help mere

The statement cannot be justified because Nepal isn't small, neither figuratively nor in literal sense.

Nepal is bigger than half the countries in the world. The nation of England, which originally was/is smaller than Nepal in size, once ended up owning half of Earth, and, directly or indirectly subjugating 2/3rd of all human beings on Earth.

The world we live in today is very much a world defined by the English conquerors/invaders/colonizers. Nation states like the USA, Canada, Australia, wouldn't even exist if not for the English people. This question wouldn't have been asked in English, I wouldn't have written this answer in English, and, you wouldn't have read this answer in English, if not for the English people. The architect of the modern world came from a country that was/is smaller than Nepal in size. So, how can you/anyone justify Nepal is small?

*Note: I do get the gist of the question. It was meant to highlight the immense diversity of people, languages, and, socio-cultural norms in Nepal. But once you realize that Nepal isn't small at all, the second half of your question becomes obvious and doesn't need justifications. Nepal is diverse and resembles the world cause Nepal is not small but big.

Well the french and indian war took place around 1754-1763 also they were pitted the colonies of british america against those of new france, each side supported by military units from the parent country by american indian it was a seven years war, but it ended with the treaty of paris in main point is that the british wanted to settle in the ohio river valley and to trade with native americans who lived there,so the french built forts to protect their trade with the indians,also in 1754, george washington led an army against the french! can finish it off(hope that (: