The Kyle Rittenhouse case represents not only an example of a violent counter protester (Rittenhouse) but a peaceful protest which had turned violent and led to the distruction of many small businesses in Kenosha, Wisconsin. How do you think the government should have handled this case better to prevent what happened from happening? Is there any way for the government to know when a protest will turn violent? How should they try to stop violence while not limiting our right to assemble?

Mark the four statements that are true. 1. the democrats blamed the republicans for the stock market crash of 1929. 2. the democrats won the presidency in the 1990's but lost control of the congress. 3. the democratic party is the oldest political party in the united states. 4. the anti-federalists were one of the first two american political parties; they wanted a strong central government. 5. the "era of good feelings" was a period from 1816-1824 where there was only one political party: the democrat-republicans.