subject
Social Studies, 02.12.2021 16:00 bankscorneliuso39

Which of the following statements best describes a theocracy, as seen in Iran? A) in Iran, the supreme leader is part of parliament
B) in Iran, the supreme leader is appointed by a religious advisory
C) in Iran, the supreme leader is elected by the people
D) in Iran, the supreme leader is responsible to the will of the people


Which of the following statements best describes a theocracy, as seen in Iran?

A) in Iran, the su

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00, msjoey45
The term "jim crow" is used to describe which of these? a) bans on hunting b) segregation of the races c) preventing women from voting d) creating more public schools
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:30, sabrinarasull1pe6s61
Ball is tossed up in the air at its peak, it stops before beginning to fall. the ball at its peak has
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00, milak23
List two benefits of reforestation to the environment
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements best describes a theocracy, as seen in Iran? A) in Iran, the sup...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 31.03.2021 16:30
Konu
Mathematics, 31.03.2021 16:30
Konu
English, 31.03.2021 16:30
Konu
History, 31.03.2021 16:30