Social Studies, 28.10.2021 01:00 babyduckies37

According to the article, in 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum on whether citizens favored altering the state constitution to make all three branches of government coequal. Voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or the other. In a couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. What are the benefits of having a direct, binding referendum? What are the drawbacks?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:30, keananashville

What restrictions do you think should be placed on studies with animal participants? explain

Answers: 2

continue

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:30, keidaniela

If u can vote in an election for a governor representative without political or religious restriction, where do you most likely live? a. isreal b. jordan c. lebanon d. syria plz

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:30, elwinelwin9475

Occurs with the fully informed request of a competant adult patient or their surrogate. culture of life: select the best answer from the choices provided. a. voluntary euthanasia b. nonvoluntary euthanasia c. involuntary euthanasia d. passive euthanasia

Answers: 1

continue

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 11:00, TheOneandOnly003

Ineed finishing this i missed 4 days of school and missed out on a lot of reading

Answers: 1

continue

You know the right answer?

According to the article, in 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum on whether citizens favor...