What did the final rule under title ix formally add to the title ix definition of sexual harassment?

Emily naturally blinks whenever her sister pretends she is going to poke her in the eye. her sister, a psychology major, then decides to have a little fun. she pairs the word “psychology” (neutral stimulus) with pretending to poke emily in the eye (unconditioned stimulus), which automatically makes emily blink (unconditioned response). soon, emily blinks as soon as she hears the word “psychology.” when emily blinks when hearing the word “psychology,” even when her sister does not pretend to poke her in the eye, the word “psychology’ is now the

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Name 2 laws that states can still control today