The Chthonic legal tradition introduces the idea that even at the most basic level of society there are legal traditions. In the textbook, the author divides the Chthonic identity into two basic models. Briefly explain these two models, and provide at least 2 examples of the current exchange of Chthonic and western legal information. Are there any similarities between the Christian tradition of oral history and the Chthonic tradition

can you explain it better

dude the first thing it says is that copied answers will get a zero. plus it would take anyone on an incredibly long time to answer. ive seen 2 people asking the exact same question and their questions got taken down. i have the assignment too, and im in the progress of doing it. i suggest going to a more private website, because this is the first place teachers look.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.