subject
Social Studies, 11.07.2021 07:40 leo4687

Pls answer me and dont steal my points​


Pls answer me and dont steal my points​

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, mprjug6
How is germany's location in europe an advantage during wwii?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, live4dramaoy0yf9
An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank. however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day. b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual. c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it. d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:10, nestergurl101
Amain difference between state and federal courts is state courts try disputes between states, while federal courts try cases between citizens of a state. state courts try cases between citizens of a state, while federal courts try disputes between states. state courts consider the facts and law in making a decision, while federal courts consider the law, facts, and precedents. state courts consider the facts and precedents in a decision, while federal courts consider the law, facts, and precedents.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 20:00, cat20220
To treat a group unfairly because of race religion or gender
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Pls answer me and dont steal my points​
...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 26.11.2021 17:30