subject
Social Studies, 10.07.2021 03:20 annan65

Carrie is analyzing the difference between what a customer is willing to pay for a product/service and how much it costs the firm to offer the product/service. Cassie is examining the difference between what the firm ultimately charges for the product/service and how much it costs the firm to offer the product/service. Carrie is analyzing ___, and Cassie is analyzing ___.

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00, caleb1009
China wants to take control over social media in which other region? question 4 options: taiwan chile japan hong kong
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:00, biancabell3
Earlier studies were more slanted toward a. the upper class. c. caucasian males. b. teenagers in school. d. caucasian females. select the best answer from the choices provided a b c d
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30, zahradawkins2007
Describe the relationship between population growth consumption and the environment.
Answers: 2
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, live4dramaoy0yf9
An employee of the state government always received his state paycheck on the last workday of the month. the employee was not a good money manager, and just barely managed to make it from paycheck to paycheck each month. on the second to the last workday of the month, the employee had $45 in his checking account, and, needing to buy a birthday gift for his sister, he wrote a check to a gift boutique for $100. he knew that he would be receiving his paycheck the next day, so he could deposit the paycheck before the check would be sent to the bank. however, unbeknownst to the employee, the state legislature was having a budget impasse. because the state constitution prohibited any deficit spending, state employees were not paid as usual. without a paycheck to deposit, the check written to the gift boutique was returned for insufficient funds. the merchant complained to the police, who arrested the employee and charged him under a statute that prohibited "issuing a check knowing that it is drawn against insufficient funds, with intent to defraud the payee of the check."what should be the outcome of the employee's prosecution? a not guilty, because the employee intended to deposit his paycheck the next day. b not guilty, because it was reasonable for the employee to expect that he would receive his paycheck as usual. c guilty, because the employee knew when he wrote the check that he did not have sufficient funds in his account to honor it. d guilty, because reliance on a future source of income does not vitiate the employee's violation of the statute when he wrote the check.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Carrie is analyzing the difference between what a customer is willing to pay for a product/service a...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 15.01.2021 20:30
Konu
Physics, 15.01.2021 20:30
Konu
Mathematics, 15.01.2021 20:30