Which of the following statement concerning personality and cultural values is not true? Multiple Choice Cultural values capture what cultures are like. Adjectives such as "polite" and "reserved" are examples of traits summarizing a person’s personality. Personality traits are a function of both your genes and your environment. Personality captures what people are like, while ability captures what people can do. Employees are the same anywhere in the world—responsible, easygoing employees from the United States act the same as responsible, easygoing employees in China.

Employees are the same anywhere in the world—responsible, easygoing employees from the United States act the same as responsible, easygoing employees in China.

Explanation:

The personality values are the traits that we think or fell to be true or right. It is the traits of a person that are deeply held principles of a person.

The cultural values are the values or the traits that we belief in or practice which is related to the society or our faith.

IN the context, the statement that is not true about the personality values and the cultural values is that --

the employees are same and behave similarly everywhere in the world. They are easygoing and responsible everywhere. The employees of USA act similarly as the employees of China.

This is false because the personality values and the cultural values differ from person to person and from country to country. So the employees of the US are not as same as the employees of China.

answer; i believe its (transgender);

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals