A fleeing bank robber ran into a school and took the principal hostage at gunpoint. The police, who had received a detailed description of the clothing the robber was wearing, surrounded the school and demanded that the robber come out with his hands up. When it began to get dark, the robber ordered the principal to undress, and the robber switched clothing with the principal. He tied the principal's hands to his side and pushed the principal out the door first. Seeing that the first person out of the door did not emerge with hands up and that the person was wearing clothing the robber was described as wearing, a police sharpshooter shot and killed the principal. The robber was captured and put on trial for the murder of the principal. Should the jury find the robber guilty?

Explanation:

respuesta correcta  si

Yes, because of the cloth he changed with the principal cost his life

Explanation:

This is a complex case. The Jury would have to be careful with it because the robber would want to prove he's not guilty since he didn't shot the principal but in the real sense, he set the principal up for death because he exchanged his identity in wears with what the principal wore. The jury after his questioning which would propose enough proof would fine the robber for murder based on this reasons;

(i) intent to kill

(ii) intent to inflict great bodily injury

(iii) awareness of an unjustifiably high risk to human life or

(iv) intent to commit a felony.

The robber compelled the principal in some actions that set him up for his death.

this question your asking is true hope this and you get a 100 percent : )