When a minor falsely advises the other party that he is of the age of majority and based upon that misrepresentation, the other party in good faith enters into a contract with the minor:

Following are the solution to the given question:

Explanation:

In a mistaken declaration by a child of his age and depending on such misrepresentation, another party engages with a child in good faith. There is no unitary norm. States vary, but any of the above may be valid, based on the jurisdiction.

But you're not bound by the contract whether you have accepted and are under 18 (In the U.S.). If they are brought to court, they will win because a minor cannot agree under 18. Even when a minor is about maturity in the contract, a contract is void.

d. i assume the underlined word is "role." reformat if it isn't.

explanation:

role is closest to part because when replacing words, "playing a vital decision," "playing a vital activity," and "playing a vital dollar" don't make logical sense. the only meaningful choice is "playing a vital part."

this fits one of merriam-webster's definitions of role: "a function or part performed especially in a particular operation or process."