Right to be protected right to express faith
right to be born
right to have a family
right to education
right to have a name
IP
Mikail​

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patron’s painting. the artist’s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artist’s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

Essay: both benedict arnold and alexander hamilton were ambitious men who took great risks as leaders in the american revolution. write an essay in which you discuss the impact that the ambitions of individuals had on the birth of the united states. remember to use textual evidence from both written sources to support your argument.

Those with high self-esteem are highly critical of their strengths and weaknesses. true or false