This is my second time doing this if you dont mind would eeryone who looks at this leave a five start rating on all of my answers and a thanks, and also go to my profile and press thanks and dont forget to send a friend request. Give away brainliest, 5-star rating, and a thanks

If you answer and dont do anything just for the points I will report you.

Awoman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. the crime scene was processed and investigators left. the next day, the medical examiner reported that a scalloped, woven belt was used to strangle the victim. the police asked the husband to search the house again to look for such a belt and he agreed. a belt was found that matched marks on the victim. the man was arrested. his attorney made a motion that the belt be excluded from the evidence as he contended that the search was not legal. which statement is true? a. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as needed according to the fourth amendment to the u. s. constitution. b. the belt is admissible because the man gave his consent to the second search. c. the belt should be excluded because the search was not legal. the police did not obtain a search warrant, as need according to michigan v. tyler. d. the belt is admissible as evidence, according to mincey v. arizona.

The political and economic power of roman catholic church was challenged during the reformation by

{[ hoi! ]} which was not the name of a french government branch? a. directory b. national convention c. constitution d. national assembly