Aperson who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision can take the case to another state’s court.
can take the case to a different trial court.
can take the case to a higher court.
can take the case to a federal court.

A person who is not satisfied with an appellate court’s decision "can take the case to a higher court."

On the off chance that you disagree with a decision of court or think your punishment is excessively brutal, you can claim, you can appeal to a higher court.  

However, a higher court could dismiss your appeal and give you a much harsher punishment. Get legitimate counsel before choosing to request a decision.  

You can appeal against liable decisions (on the off chance that you argued not liable) and sentence brutality. The Crown (the state or central government) can't bid a jury's decision of not liable, but rather can request sentence tolerance.

Can take the case to a higher court.

Explanation:

Justice is one of the pillars of democracy and exists to maintain social order and to ensure broad defense, that is, everyone must have access to justice and due process. The judicial apparatus in different degrees of jurisdiction exists to ensure the smoothness of all proceedings. In this way, when a citizen loses an action in court, he or she can appeal to an appellate court. If he or she still considers that the court decision was not correct, he or she may appeal to a higher court and maybe to the Supreme Court, wich is the maximum instance of justice. In this way, more than one judge analyzes the case in order to lessen the chances of an unfair verdict.

~kinetic ~potential

explanation:

kinetic and potential energies would be types of mechanical energies.

the answer is tom watson. tom watson created this epitaph because he wanted to increase the sympathy felt by people towards the murder of mary phagan.