What was the ruling in the 1874 supreme court case minor v.
happersett?
a. that...
Social Studies, 25.01.2020 09:31 peterradu47781
What was the ruling in the 1874 supreme court case minor v.
happersett?
a. that voting was not a basic right of citizens, therefore women could be denied the right to vote
b. that voting was a basic right of citizens, therefore women must be given the right to vote
c. that voting was a basic right of all residents of the united states, therefore immigrants must be given the right to vote
d. that voting was a basic right of only literate citizens, therefore those that could not read or write english could be denied the vote
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:00, Bhoom1871
For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes
Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00, makenziemartinez
What are the basic input of iron and steel industry
Answers: 1
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 20:10
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 20:10
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 20:10
Health, 03.03.2021 20:10
Mathematics, 03.03.2021 20:10