subject
Social Studies, 19.08.2019 23:30 celseylynn8110

In the spirit of the laws (1748), argues that any government, if it is to protect the liberty of its citizens, needs a. rousseau . . a strong legislature b. montesquieu . . a separation of powers c. locke . . a strong monarch to serve as a father figure d. filmer . . a constitution in which rights are explicitly outlined

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Social Studies

image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30, astr0neya
Why were the gods angry at odysseus in the odyssey
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:10, uehlingt39
When children heard an interesting story about a sympathetic and resourceful african-american child, the aim was to provide them with?
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30, axelperezdeleon8440
Today natural rights are referred to as human rights. discuss how respect for human rights can further be improved.
Answers: 1
image
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30, nanagardiner08
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In the spirit of the laws (1748), argues that any government, if it is to protect the liberty of it...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 12.10.2020 14:01