The supreme court case worcester v. georgia was a small victory for the cherokee nation in georgia because it
a) struck down laws created by the georgia legislature to seize cherokee lands.
b) ruled that the u. s. government’s indian removal act was unconstitutional.
c) established the indian territory east of the mississippi in present-day oklahoma.
d) declared that the u. s. government would honor the cherokee nation’s constitution.

Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.

Further Explanation:  

Worcester v. Georgia was the case of 1832 of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Renounce the conviction of Worcester. Supreme Court also held that any land of America without the license by the state to be considered as unconstitutional. It built up doctrine of tribal sovereignty. The ruling laid out a strong relationship between the Indian nations and the USA. John Marshall said that the character of the USA government is federal. Indian states would not be given any authority in the American Indian affairs. Thus Georgia statute is unconstitutional. The ruling was given to avoid the political conflict of the court and the executive. The ruling had ordered for Worcester to be free and they complied to the order several months later. Later in 1833 the new governor Wilson Lumpkin gave the order to pardon Worcester if they stop their activities in the Cherokee. Worcester and Butler complied to the order and they both were set free. Worcester came to the Indian Territory when Cherokee removal was on trial in 1836. Worcester joined his ministry back and translated the bible backing to Cherokee. The first printing press was established in the USA that worked with Cherokee for publishing the newspaper. There are several treaties between the USA government and the Cherokee.

Learn more:

1. Compare and contrast lifestyle choices that positively affect physical fitness with those that negatively affect physical fitness.

link

2. Discuss why a physically active job does not guarantee better physical fitness.

link

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Chapter: Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia

Subject: Social Science

Keywords: Conviction, license, unconstitutional, American Indian affairs, political conflict, new governor, Wilson Lumpkin, first printing press.

A) struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.

Worcester v. Georgia (1832) was a significant victory for the Cherokee Nation in Georgia in the antebellum period. In this case, the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Georgia statute which prohibited non-natives from being present on Native American land without a license was unconstitutional. It argued that the Cherokee could be understood as another nation, and the United States did not have the right to control the land or possessions of other nations at will. Moreover, the responsibility of dealing with foreign nations was held by the federal government, not by the states. The case built the foundations of tribal sovereignty in the United States.

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.

manifest functions are the recognized and intended consequences of any social pattern, while latent functions are those unrecognized and unintended consequences. to analyze the manifest functions of any social institution, we have to study its contribution to the continuation of a group, community, or society.